Tuesday, May 26, 2020

Body Piercing and Tattoos in America - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 3 Words: 822 Downloads: 2 Date added: 2017/09/15 Category Advertising Essay Did you like this example? Daylinda Smith Dr. Mc Williams Exp. Writing 3200 October 28, 2009 Body Piercings and Tattoos in America For many people, body piercings and tattoos are on the fringe of society. People do this as an act of rebellion against the social standards. In many cultures, these body modifications have negative or positive acceptance, but in American’s society, body modification, for many decades, has received a very negative response. Nevertheless, body piercings and tattoos have become more mainstream. In many movies, advertisements, music videos, and television programs, people have flaunted their body piercings and tattoos. When did body modification become more acceptable in America’s society, and is it a passing trend in society? The answer is no. It was not until the middle 1990’s that body piercing came into style because of musicians and celebrities. Body modification appeared in the mid to late 1990’s and started gaining acceptance with performers like Brittany Spears and Christine Aguilera showing off their body piercings in music videos. The Craft, Fairuza Balk plays a character that has a nose piercing. This movie was produced in1996 and is one of the first movies where a main actress has a visible body piercing. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Body Piercing and Tattoos in America" essay for you Create order This actress portrayed a teenage girl in high school who would reach out to the younger generation of the mid 1990’s who needed a new way to distinguish themselves. However, this movie is one of the first media genres that would have body piercings and tattoos on a visible part of the body. In television show Charmed from the television season from 1998 to 2007 casted Holly Combs, Rose McGowan, and Alyssa Milano, all three of which had visible tattoos. Alyssa Milano did not only have tattoos but also a nose piercing on the television show. This television show ran for eight seasons beginning with the main characters all having some type of body modification in plain sight of the audience. Charmed was directed towards the younger generation in high school and young adult audience from 18 to 25 years old. With body piercing and tattoos in such obvious places on the actresses, the audience would gain the perception that body modification had become more acceptable. These young adults would move from the body modification as an act of rebellion to more of a fashion trend. Movies and television shows are not the only media that display performers with body piercings and tattoos. According to Sally Kubetin, â€Å"By the 1950’s and 1960’s, tattooing had become a mark of the marginalized among Americans, becoming a more common sight on prisoners, motorcycle bikers, and gang members—and rarely, if ever seen on Wall Street broker† (Kubetin). The media genre of music has been known for decades to have musicians with tattoos. The musicians of rock were best known for these tattoos. Musicians in bands such as AC/DC, Aerosmith, Iron Maiden, Poison, and many others have tattoos. Nevertheless, tattoos still received a negative response from conservative Americans. Singers in their 20’s and 30’s like Christina Aguilera and Brittany Spears were some of the first musicians that had body piercings. Singers were the pivoting point for young adults and people of their early twenties, proving that body piercings and tattoos were acceptable in society. Those in their twenties and thirties that are interested in body modification; aid the trend to imitate singers, but it has become acceptable within society to have body piercings and tattoos. Jenn Horne, on the College Student Journal states, 4â€Å"Today, tattoos and piercings have become more mainstream. This study reports the survey of 400 undergraduates at a large southeastern university. Regarding tattoos, 27% (women more than men) reported having a tattoo† (Horne and Knox). Tattoos and body piercings are very popular with growing population getting more of them every year. The different entertainment genres have drawn a new interest in tattoos and body piercings. Since the people in their twenties and thirties have embraced the idea of body modification the interest of these has gained popularity in society. According to Horne and Knox, â€Å"While no national data are available, numerous smaller studies suggest that about 20 percent of young age 18-25 have a tattoo; one third have a piercing â€Å" (Horne). This is due to so many celebrities getting more and more tattoos and body piercings. The response is that tattoos and body piercings have moved from being an unacceptable act of rebellion to a social normal. Body piercings and tattoos will remain acceptable in society as long as celebrities have them and desire these body modifications. Works Cited Charmed. Brad Kern. Paramount Pictures. 998-2007 Horne, Jenn and David Knox. â€Å"Tattoos And Piercings: Attitudes,Behaviors, And Interpretations Of College Students†. College Student Journal (2007): 1011-1020. Academic Search Premier. Ebsco. Austin Peay State University. Oct. 23 2009: https://web. ebscohost. com/ehost/ detail Kubetin, Sally Koch. â€Å"Researchers Seek To Quantify Prevalence Of Piercings, Tattoos: Are Tattoos, Piercings Mainstream?. Family Practice News. 34. 7 (2004): General Onefile. Gale. Oct 23. 2009: https://find. galegroup. com/gtx/start. do The Craft. Andrew Fleming. Columbia Pictures. 1996

Friday, May 15, 2020

British View On Why Colonies Revolted - 946 Words

BRITISH VIEW ON WHY COLONIES REVOLTED 2 British View on Why Colonies Revolted For many years prior to the revolt, the colonies had been attracting various groups of individuals who were not supportive of the British government. There were those who came to be land owners and were hoping for a better life than they had in England. Others left England agreeing to years of work as indentured servants before becoming free individuals (Tindall Shi 2013). Some sought freedom from religious persecution and others were forced to come as the colonies were a dropping point for criminals (Fogelman, 1998). This conglomeration of individuals put in place the elements which might be called the â€Å"perfect storm†. These very individuals encouraged a revolt against the English Parliament when merely asked to assist in financial support of England through taxes. Moreover, the English only asked this after years of supporting the colonists both economically as well as defending them in war. It was time for the colonists to be active members of British societ y yet they chose to act like spoiled children. The Relationship Between the Colonies and England England has been consistently supportive of the colonies. In fact, the charter compiled by the Virginia Company included wording to ensure that colonists would have all of the liberties, franchises as well as immunities which are available to citizens of England (Virginia Company, 2013). For a periodShow MoreRelatedThe American Revolution Through British Eyes By Christopher Hibbert872 Words   |  4 PagesRedcoats and Rebels: The American Revolution Through British Eyes, Christopher Hibbert portrays the sequence of events that happened in the American revolution from a British perspective. The author’s main idea in this narrative is to demonstrate the war from a different point of view and to emphasize the narratives from a British audience. Mr. Hibbert’s subject in this matter of the book, illustrates the life of the American people and the British loyalist representing both sides of the war. The author’sRead Mo reHas the U.S. Lived up to its Founding Principles?1287 Words   |  6 Pagesto which a nation is governed. Our founding fathers created the US Constitution to set specific standards for our country. We must ask ourselves why our founding fathers created the Constitution in the first place. America revolted against the British due to their monarchy form of government. After the American Revolution, each of the original 13 colonies operated under its own rules of government. Most states were against any form of centralized rule from the government. They feared that what happenedRead MoreEssay on Zinn Howard Questions Ch 1-63683 Words   |  15 Pages 9. Many slaves did not accept their fate easily, so many slaves revolted, many attempted to run away, many attempted incidents of sabotage on their masters, and many risked their lives to keep their family together. 10. Slave owners feared poor whites because the poor whites were economically poor, and they were frustrated with the white aristocrats. The poor whites were ready to rebel and in many instances they revolted with blacks. Zinn Chapter 3: Persons of Mean and Vile Condition Read MoreSummary of 13 Chapters of Belize5562 Words   |  23 Pageswith the historical data, but offers us some explanation and interpretation of what the hard facts mean. Chapter 1 This chapter is a history of Belize which intents to clarify the formation and development of the present state. The presence of the British, in turn resulted from the coming of Christopher Columbus to the Americans and the subsequent incursions by various European powers. Columbus thought that he had lands in India. The Maya Frontier includes the division of ancient Maya CivilizationRead MoreEssay on The Impact of Slave Resistance1752 Words   |  8 Pageswritten in 1776, once wrote this famous phrase that, â€Å"all men are created equal.† In America, equality of humanity was long desired, sought after by slaves, and abolitionists since the first African slaves were brought over by ship to the Virginian colony in 1619. Much felt that slavery should not exist, that it should not be allowed, and they wanted it abolished. Resistance was shown in many ways that we would all just naturally think of like rebelliousness, faking a sickness, or working at a slowRead MoreMexican Am erican War Essay4448 Words   |  18 Pagesinspired many Mexicans to continue to fight for their freedom. In 1813 and 1814 Jose Maria Morelos y Pavon was also put into death for also trying to bring down the gachupines, it wasn’t until 1821 when Mexico got its independence. One of the reasons why there was even a war was because the U.S tried to annex Texas. President Anson Jones had accused the U.S of trying to â€Å"annex a war†. Mexico called the Americans Yankees because they were Anglo-Americans and they weren’t from Mexico. The other reasonRead MoreFeds vs Anti-Feds3174 Words   |  13 Pagesback Hamilton’s Federalists preferred a much stronger central government, an â€Å"elastic† reading of the Constitution, and a hands-off approach to the French Revolution. 3) Which view do you think was best for the US – Hamilton’s or Jefferson’s – and why? [This part should be several paragraphs long] I don’t know if either view could be considered better or worse for America. Forced to choose, I would probably lean toward Hamiltonian ideas, but I believe both served a vital and necessary role in formingRead More War Between Ethiopians and Eritreans Essay4836 Words   |  20 Pagesanalyzing the grand effect of this war, the individual is often overlooked. Benyam Berhe is from Addis Abbas, Ethiopia. He and I have had multiple conversations pertaining to the war between Ethiopia and Eritrea. Benyam maintained a largely apathetic view to most of the war in spite of the fact that the front line was less than 1000 kilometers from his porch. Though he was only 15 when it all started, he did watch avidly all the news channels as the bombs started to fall. According to Benyam theRead MoreRational Appeasement15291 Words   |  62 Pagesstrategy of â€Å"one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last+† 1 Reasons for distrusting the policy were, in fact, noticed long before Munich+ Classical political thinkers from Thucydides to Machiavelli offer many statements of the anti-appeasement view+ Appeasement, many argue, is not just futile: it is self-destructive+ The danger is most acute when many potential challengers exist+ Acceding to one challenger undermines the appeaser’s reputation for resolve and encourages others to attack, starting

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

How does William Wordsworths poetry fit into the...

How does William Wordsworths poetry fit into the literary tradition of Romanticism? Q. How does William Wordsworths poetry fit into the literary tradition of Romanticism? A. Romantic poetry was an artistic movement of the late 18th and early 19th century. It dealt with nature, human imagination, childhood and the ability to recall emotional memories of both happiness and sadness. Before Wordsworth began writing his revolutionary new style of poetry, all preceding poetry had a very different style. The reason these poems were classed as revolutionary was because he believed that romantic poetry should describe incidents of common life and ordinary people and were written in deliberately plain words. It was what†¦show more content†¦She sees her cottage and we see how happy she is. and a single small cottage the only dwelling on earth that she loves She looks, her heart to heaven This shows how happy she is at seeing her cottage, in the countryside that she loves. However, this soon fades. The images go away and she is sad once again as she goes back to her unhappy life in the city where she feels trapped. This fits into Romanticism by including most of the main features. It deals with human feelings and how Susan is sad. It includes memories and the use of imagination. It also shows probably the most important feature, which is a love of nature. We see that Susan feels truly happy surrounded by hills and pastures. We also see this in Wordsworths most famous and well-known poem Daffodils. Wordsworth thought of his poetry as originating in emotion recollected in tranquillity. His memories were memories of strong feelings of happiness brought about by something or some landscape connected to the nature. In Daffodils, we again see all the features that make this poem fit into the tradition of Romanticism and Romantic Poetry. Wordsworth describes nature and says how beautiful it is and the beauty he sees when he looks at the daffodils. when all at once I saw a crowd, a host of golden daffodils. He also uses his imagination to see the daffodils almost as human beings. He describes their movements as, and comparesShow MoreRelatedSummary of She Dwelt Among the Untrodden Ways11655 Words   |  47 PagesThe Lucy poems William Shuter, Portrait of William Wordsworth, 1798. Earliest known portrait of Wordsworth, painted in the year he wrote the first drafts of The Lucy poems[1] The Lucy poems are a series of five poems composed by the English Romantic poet William Wordsworth (1770–1850) between 1798 and 1801. All but one were first published during 1800 in the second edition of Lyrical Ballads, a collaboration between Wordsworth and Samuel Taylor Coleridge that was both Wordsworths first major publicationRead More The Romantic Imagination in Wordsworths Tintern Abbey Essay2622 Words   |  11 Pagesderogate poetry in comparison with science (300). Abrams also notes that in his Thoughts Concerning Education, Locke (echoing the opinion of the Elizabethan Puritans that poets are wantons, as well as useless) does not disguise his contempt for the unprofitableness of a poetic career, either to the poet himself or (by implication) to others (300). Similarly, when Newton was asked for his judgement of poetry, he replied Ill tell you that of Barrow:--he said, that poetry was a kindRead MoreCompare the Ways in Which Hopkins’ ‘God’s Grandeur’ and Wordsworth’s ‘the World Is Too Much with Us’ Use the Sonnet Form to Address Their Contemporary Concerns.4584 Words   |  19 Pagesand environmental change, experienced an astounding shift in poetic style, in which many based their work on the ‘beauty’ of their surroundings, and how mankind affected this. Of this period, two of the leading nature poets in British literary history, Gerard Manley Hopkins and William Wordsworth became known, renowned as great figures in British literary history. Both adopted a ‘sacramental’ view of nature, that is they saw beyond the obvious features commonly associated with the natural world suchRead MoreThe Sonnet Form: William Shakespeare6305 Words   |  26 PagesShakespeareâ €™s Sonnets William Shakespeare The Sonnet Form A sonnet is a fourteen-line lyric poem, traditionally written in iambic pentameter—that is, in lines ten syllables long, with accents falling on every second syllable, as in: â€Å"Shall I compare thee to a summer’s day?† The sonnet form first became popular during the Italian Renaissance, when the poet Petrarch published a sequence of love sonnets addressed to an idealized woman named Laura. Taking firm hold among Italian poets, the sonnet

Tuesday, May 5, 2020

Tess Durbeyfield in Tess of the DUrbervilles and Sarah Woodruff in The French Lieutenants Woman Essay Example For Students

Tess Durbeyfield in Tess of the DUrbervilles and Sarah Woodruff in The French Lieutenants Woman Essay To be a fallen woman in Victorian society, was to be ordained sinful and would be outcast from the social world. Both authors choose to use this theme as a pivotal point in their novels. However, even though both are set in the 1800s, Fowles was writing a hundred years after Hardy. Some may say that this allows him the perspective needed to judge and make decisions. He could also draw parallels from the 1800s to his own time. In fact, one of the great ironies in Fowles novel is that while Sarah is such an innately free spirit, she is born and trapped into this intolerant, hypocritical society. He leads the reader to believe that if only Sarah were born into the liberal age of the 1960s, her spirit would be fulfilled. On the other hand, this gap of time could take away from the illusion of being written at the time that comes naturally to Hardy. As just mentioned, Fowles was writing in the 60s, a time of freedom of mind, body and soul, which is apparent in the character of Sarah, who personifies this wonderfully. Sarah prefers to be a visible social pariah rather than one who attempts to reform and assimilate into society. It is evident to the reader that Fowles had obviously studies a lot of Victorian text to get an understanding of writing techniques of the time. For instance he packs as much detail of the landscape into the opening chapter as possible, with use of references to historical findings in the places; which is not his usual writing style, redolent of seven hundred years of English history. Fowles uses incredibly long, tumbling sentences with as much detail to the setting as possible, being that largest bite from the underside of Englands outstretched south-western leg. A major difference between the two is that Hardy took a great risk in publishing this novel, as the subjects he covered such as rape were considered taboo in his time. However in doing so, he was able to draw attention to the very controversial subject of womens rights, which he felt strongly about. Fowles, on the other hand, took no such risk. Writing in the post-feminist 1960s, he was able to look in retrospect to womens liberation. Although his views are similar to Hardys, and possibly were influenced by them, there is nothing ground breaking about Fowles writing. The way in which the heroine is introduced to the reader by the author, tells us a lot about the character. Fowles does this more directly than Hardy, almost portraying Sarah as the witch on the cove. Dressed all in black, unwavering against the ocean spray, she stands like a statue Its clothes were black, this quote alone shows how Fowles wants us to view Sarah; without identity, thus foreshadowing the mystery that shrouds Sarah throughout the novel. Hardy however takes a far more subtle approach, introducing her father as a rather foolish drunkard learning of his past. Hardy purposely does this, to show us what could possibly be reason for all Tess trouble, rather than introducing the actual character first. In both of the novels, intellect is clearly a key factor to the structure. Born to be a farmers wife but educated to be something better shows that although both Tess and Sarah have been born into very poor families, they have still been educated quite well. This is then contrasted by Fowles, as Ernestina, the rich businessmans daughter is evidently a lot less deep and mature in her thoughts than either Tess or Sarah. This hints that, while Ernestina may well have had a more expensive education, she has had a lot less experience of life, and is not as intelligent; described by Charles as a pretty little thing, yet a shallow little thing. This is a sign of Fowles continuing the work that Hardy started 100 years previously, as he too was a strong supporter of womens rights, and rebelled against the class system. Fowles deliberately contrasts the character of Ernestina to Sarah to emphasise the abnormal nature of Sarah. Ernestina is described to be the height of fashion, however Sarah is not even given the privilege of being called a woman. Both Tess and Sarah are the definitive independent woman, who are happy to live alone. Spending most of her adulthood away from home, Tess worked with strangers and made friends along the way. Sarah also seems to love being along, spending many hours sitting and indeed sleeping on the cliff tops; although this is seen to be a lure for Charles, Charles was about to climb back to the path black figure appeared out of the trees. What at first appears to be a similarity between the two characters later turns out to be their biggest difference. Tess and Sarah both appear to be victims; of men, society and the universe in general. Analyzing The Story of an Hour EssayIt is not just Charles that shares his opinion of Sarah, Dr. Grogan summarises the readers thoughts on Sarah clearly when he comments that she has a warped mind. Many characters in the French Lieutenants Woman believe Sarah to not be of sound mind. In contrast we gather most of the opinions of Tess through Hardy, her bouncing handsome womanliness. A great majority of the descriptions of Tess are referring to her physical attributes, which of course is her downfall. Being physically mature beyond her years, men are attracted to her, which he see in the cases of Alec and Angel. Alec says, How loveable her face was to him. Although Hardy and Fowles do have differing styles, their messages are almost exactly the same. They have both written moralistic stories which communicate their views by showing how the pressures of society, have caused the degradation of key characters. It is the hope of success that is the main driving force of each novel, and the reader is compelled to have faith in the naive dreams of the characters as even though the characters failure is inevitable, you cant help but want them to succeed. This is more so in the case of Tess, where Hardy has created a more likeable character, thus in turn creating more sympathy and love for the character. Some critics have remarked that because of the limited perspective that Hardy gained on Victorian society, it happens so that the reader is left with a first hand view; and as Hardy is writing through Tess, the reader has the same perspective as Tess, which also helps to promote emotion and compassion for her. Hardys representation of Tess is highly sympathetic. He utilizes authorial comment in the novel to explain, justify or comment on Tess actions. He asks the responder, Why it was that upon this beautiful feminine tissue, sensitive as gossamer, and practically blank as snow as yet, there should have been traced such a coarse pattern as it was doomed to receive. Through the use of accumulation of positive attributes, such as beautiful, feminine and sensitive, it shows that Hardy values women. He sees that women are victims of men and challenges the values of Victorian society. Even from the titles of the chapters uses derogatory terms, such as Maiden no more and The Woman Pays, shows that after Tess was raped by Alec, she is no longer classified as a maiden. The title The Woman Pays also emphasises that even if Angel and Tess carry out the same acts, it is the woman who ends up in paying for the wrong doing. Hardy was able to pose his opinions in a far subtler way by adding them into a story rather than announcing them publicly. He was probably able to reach a far greater audience using this method. Fowles uses his novel in much the same way, but instead of hiding his views behind a story, he actively removes the narrator and poses arguments straight. This method allows the reader to actually consider the opinions of the author, rather than just accepting the subliminal suggestions of Hardy. John Fowles and Thomas Hardy both write on very similar subjects; their stories circulate around very strong, rebellious women who are fighting the social conformities set down by their male oppressors. Fowles tells the story from the point of view of Charles, and hence we do not gain full insight into Sarahs thoughts, making it difficult to connect and understand her as a character. This is Fowles downfall as you cant feel emotion for a character if you do not understand what they are thinking; which strikes the question, is Sarah actually realistic as a 19th century heroine as Fowles himself does not display sympathy for his own character. Hardy presents Tess as a very moral person from the very beginning of the novel, and in displaying her as a genuinely good person which generate the feeling of tragedy around her. Fowles presents Sarah as a miss guided, trouble individual, not even sure of her self, with a questionable mental state; a strange character that does not possess the power to evoke much emotion from the reader. These two heroines both depict a stance in Victorian society, however in very different ways; Sarah through illustrating the division between class, and Tess through her portrayal of the unfairness of Victorian morality.